A CLEAN SWEEP

Monday, August 15, 2011: Robert Zoellick said investors had lost confidence in the economic leadership of several key countries. He also said that the global economy was going through a "multi-speed recovery". Developing countries were now the source of growth and opportunity, Mr Zoellick said. - MORE

Chapter 34 of THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXPOSED By Victor Thorn

Why Did Americans finance the Bolshevik Revolution

Let's jump right into the fire on this one. The Bolshevik Revolution was not an uprising by poor Russians (proletariats) against their Czarist overlords. Instead, International Communism was created and financed by American capitalists and European aristocrats, not to help the downtrodden, but to increase their own power and further enslave those who were on the lower socio-economic ladder.

If the above scenario doesn't fit into the historical picture that has been paianted for us, the first question we should ask is, "Why doesn't someone in the media point out this discrepancy? In all honmesty, with a little bit of research, any journalists in the country could blow the roof off thee atrocious misrepresentaations. But they don't. Why? John Swinton, former editor of the New York Times, said it best in 1914 at the annual dinner of the American Press Association:

"There is no such thing as an independent press in America. Not a man among you dares utter his honest opinion. Were you to utter it, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. It is the duty of a New York journalists to lie, to revile, to toady at the feet of Mammon, to sell his country and his race for his daily bread, or what amounts to the same thing, his salary.

"We are tools and vassals of the rich behind the scenes. We are marionettes. These men pull the strings, and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives and our capacities are all the property of these men--we are intellectual property." [Ain't it the truth].

As far as I can tell, the situation hasn't changed one iota in the last 90 years. So, prior to delving into the mechanics of the Bolshevik Revolution, I'd like to string a bunch of quotes before you.

A point about Colonel House: Many people were suspicious of Woodrow Wilson (our country's most weak-spined commander-in-chief EVER) and his administration's reactions during the Bolshevik Revolution. The question became so probing that a man named Colonel House, one of the shrewdest Invisibles of all-time, told him on November

28, 19917, "It is exceedingly important that such criticism should be suppressed."

Russian General Arsene de Goulevitch (Carism and the Revolution): "The main purveyors of funds for the Revolution were neither the crackpot Russian millionaires nor the armed bandits of Lenin. The 'real' money primarily came from certain British and American circles which for a long time past had lent their support to the Russian Revolutionary cause. The important part played by wealthy American banker, Jacob Schiff, in the events in Russia is no l0kbngter a secret

Antony Sutton (Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution): "International finance prefers to deal with central governments. The last thing the banking community wants is decentralized nations because these dispense power ... Virtually everything the Soviets possess has been acquired from the West."

Gary Allen (None Dare Call It Conspiracy): "Communism and Socialism are not a share-the-wealth program, but a consolidate-and-control-the-wealth program ... Communism is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but is a movement created, manipulated, and use by power-seeking billionaires in order to gain control over the world ... first by establishing socialists governments in the various nations, then consolidating them all through a 'greater merger' into an all-powerful world Socialists super state under the auspices of the United Nations."

Winston Churchill: "Lenin was sent to Russia by the Germans in the same way you might end a vial containing a culture of typhoid or of cholera to be poured into the water supply of a great city. It worked with amazing accuracy."

Frederick C. Howe (Confessions of a Monopolists,), 1906" "These are the rules of big business: get a monopoly; get society to work for you; and remember that the best of all business is politics."

Henry Davidson [J. P. Morgan partner and CFR member (1912)]: "I would rather have regulation and control; than free competition."

TIMELINE

1914-18: As World War I raged on, Lenin had been to Switzerland since 1905, while Leon Trotsky was in New York City writing for a Communist newspaper. Neither went to Russia because the poor huddled masses begged for their help, but only arriveed later after being sent by the power elite and the U.S., as you will soon see.

Meanwhile WW I left 1,700,000 Russian citizens dead. there were also tremendous food shortages. Their money was practically valueless, they were still battling the Germans across their border, and the government was ready to collapse. In essence, the Russian people were primed for a revolution.

March 1917: The Czar Nicholas II finally abdicated his throne. Following his departure, Prince Luov arrived on the scene to set up a form of government that he hoped would resemble America's. Shortly thereafter, however, Alexander Kerensky, revolutionary politico, stepped in and did away with Luov's vision. Meanwhile, the Russians kept fighting the Germans while a quarter-million revolutionaries returned to their homeland and toppled Kerensky.

Spring, 1917: Lenin and Trotsky returned to Russia with their pockets full of gold.

July, 1917: Lenin led his first revolution, but was abated by the Russian army.

July 19, 1917: the Russian government arrested Lenin, charging him with being a German spy; he fled to Finland.

November 7, 1917: Lenin returned to Russia and planted the seeds for another revolution.

November 26, 1917: Makeshift elections were held: less than one quarter of the Russian people voted for Vladimir Lenin.

Realizing he didn't have the public behind him, Lenin sent hordes of gun-toting radicals to make the ruling body of Russia see things in a different light.

As World War I continued, the Rothschild-controlled banks of Europe pumped millions of dollars into Lenin's coffers.

1922 - Russia became a full-blown Communist entity with the State controlling all the resources and manufacturing. This bloody process cost the lives of 28 million citizens. In the same year, famine hit Russia and 5 million people starved to death.

Lenin eventually saw the follies of Marxism and returned most of the state-run resources back to the people. Starving quickly disappeared.

1924 - Lenin died and Joseph Stalin took over, once more returning to State-control to the nation.

Overall, in one short decade, 75 million Russians died ddue to this insanity:

World War I - 1.7 million deaths

Lenin takeover - 28 million deaths

Starvation - 5 million deaths

Stalin takeover - 40 million deaths

TOTAL ----75 million deaths!!!!!

How could Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, Kagonovich, and Litvinoff get back into Russia when the government knew they wanted to overthrow it? Max Warburg, head of the German Secret Police, whose brother, Paul, was the founder and first chairman of the United Sates Federal Reserve Corporation, gave them 5 million in gold and put them, along with 159 other Bolshevik revolutionaries, on a sealed train, guaranteeing them access across the Russian border.

Another item of note is that of all the Bolshevik revolutionaries, over half were Jewish! In addition, of the top 20-30 leaders of this movement, 75% were Jewish. Marx was born in Trier, Germany, and so was Leon Trotsky. The only person of any real significance who wasn't Jewish was Lenin, who was born in Simbirsk, Russia.

MARZISM OF THE ELITE

Karl Marx said: "Political power is the organized use of force by one class in order to keep another class in subjection."

Said Vladimir Lenin upon accomplishing his mission: "Agree to any and every sacrifice and resort to all sorts of devices, maneuvers and illegal methods, to evasion and subterfuge."

The first thing we need to realize about Communism, and even more so about Clinton-like Socialism, is that these movements aren't intended to help the poor, starving, or middle-class (who will eventually be eliminated). Instead, they're created by the ruling class-capitalists and bankers - to perpetuate the reign of those already in control. Power comes from the top down, not from the masses.

Those who promote these concepts always talk about the people in need (the "proletariat"), yet none of the leaders ever come from the poor, or lower classes. Those in charge are always educated and intellectual.

You see, here's the catch. The great myth revolving around Socialism is that it's created to help the poor - that the end result is a classless society with no need for a government, police, or army.

But stop and think about something. When was the last time those in power ever willingly gave up their positions to let someone needier move in and take over? It doesn't happen, especially when the primary motivating factor behind power and control is to keep then extenuate it.

Communism and Socialism don't reattribute the wealth. These forms of government are merely tools for the super-rich to gain more power. The Bolshevik Revolution was orchestrated not from Moscow, but from New York City, Paris, and London.

In Communism and Socialism, power derives from the State. The first thing you have to do is ask yourself how much do you trust the State? Before answering, however, ponder the principle tenets of Communism:

state ownership of all land

a steeply graduated income tax

no inheritance from deceased family members

confiscation of all property from political protestors

a centrally run State bank

State run transportation systems, etc.

Now. compare these goals to the ones formulated by Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati in 1776:

abolish all existing governments )to be replaced by a one-world government)

abolish all religions

abolish all private property

abolish all inheritance

abolish the family

abolish nationalism

Although it's not popularly taught in the present day, Karl Marx, who was a member of the "League of the Just," did nothing more than update the demented scribbling of Adam Weushaupt, who founded the Illuminati. In all reality, there's nothing new about the Communist Manifesto. The "League of Just Men" was merely the extension of the Illuminati after they were forced to go underground.

While we are on the subject of Karl Marx, it should be noted that he didn't even write the original Communist Manifesto. He stole it from a French Socialists named Victor Considerant, who wrote Principles du Socialisme: Manifeste de la Democratie au Dix Neuvieme Siecle in 1843.

W. Tcherkesoff, in Pages of Socialist History, goes so far as to say that the two works are so similar, the theories, format, titles, and even chapter headings are stolen almost verbatim.

Karl Marx is the same man who supposedly had such a great concern for the lower classes, he dedicated his life to freeing them from their subservience. Yet Marx came from well-to-do family. His father was a wealthy lawyer and Karl rarely came in contact with the working class. In fact, Marx never worked a day of physical labor in his life.

One of his few "real" jobs was a correspondent and political analyst for Horace Greely's New York Times. )As a side note, both Greely and Clinton Roosevelt (of the infamous Roosevelt political family) both gave money to the Communist League to have the Communist Manifesto published.)

Karl Marx survived by leeching off people for the most of his life. Three of his six children died of starvation because he never worked, while two others committed suicide. When Marx died in 1883, only six people found it in their hearts to attend his funeral.

NOTES ON LEIN TROTSKY

When arrested while traveling to Russia to take part in the Bolshevik Revolution, Trotsky was freed by orders given directly by none other than president Woodrow Wilson.

He was given $10,000 traveling expenses by the Rockefeller family before leaving for Russia.

Trotsky was the man who discovered that a variety of Wall Street bankers were up for bankrolling a revolution in Russia.

While in New York City, like Marx, he rarely worked, yet was often seen entering the mansion of Jacob Schiff, who was undoubtedly one of the most powerful men in America at that time.

Trotsky had training facilities, i.e., "boot camps" at the Rockefeller-owned Standard Oil facility in New Jersey.

When he arrived in New York City on January 13, 1917, Trotsky didn't have a job, yet was able to maintain a top-dollar apartment and ride around in a chauffeured limousine. How was he able to live such a lifestyle? Money was bankrolled to him by Jacob Schiff.

WHY DID AMERICANS FINANCE THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION?

The biggest fallacy concerning the Bolshevik Revolution is that it originated from the people ... from the poor huddled masses. In reality, it was financed by: a) England's Lord Alfred Milner. b) Wall Street bankers such as J .P. Morgan & Company and the Rockefeller Family c) Europe's Rothschild dynasty and d) German bankers, including Max Warburg, whose brother Paul was the key man in setting up America's Federal Reserve System.

Stop for a moment and digest this information. Money for the Bolshevik Revolution came from super-rich Western financiers, some of whom were Americans! In essence, then, the very core of Communism was a partnership between monopoly-oriented Capitalists and the international Socialists movement. (No wonder the media hated Sen. Joseph McCarthy, had he kept digging all these bastards would have been exposed - ED).

Could it really be that Americans -- those who should be the most fervently opposed to Communism -- would really finance their arch nemesis? And if so, who are these people?

The traitorous Americans who turned their backs on this country accumulated their wealth during the latter part of the 1800s through banking, insurance, railroads, and industry. And even though they became incredibly rich through a free enterprise system, they are, in actuality, monopolists who want to eliminate any threat to their dominance. the notorious John D. Rockefeller even went so far as to say "competition is a sin."

It is for this reason that these men were drawn to financing the Bolshevik Revolution. Communism and Socialism are obvious forms of monopolies because the government is the only operator

Since this is the case, we need to ask ourselves, who are these people who control over these forms of government? The answer: international bankers who lend money to the State (at interest), then keep control over a central bank. If you then add clandestine "contributions and donations." bribes, and covert behind the scene deals, you can see how an economic system is manipulated to best suit those who lurk in the shadows.

Worse, these are the same back-stabbers who had a hand in starting WW I, setting up the criminal Federal Reserve System and the Federal Income Tax in 1913, and who financed the Nazi rise to power before WW II.

Who are these clever people? Surely by now you'll recognize the names: Rothschild, Rockefeller, Schiff, Warburg, Morgan, Harriman...

Max Warburg and Alexander Helphand were the primary Germans who got the ball rolling Europe in terms of money. Max Warburg is also the man who ran a Rothschild front-bank in Frankfurt, while his brother Paul was instrumental in establishing the Federal Reserve in the U.S.. Jacob Schiff was a senior partner at Kuhn., Loeb & Company, and was related through marriage to the horrendous Warburg family.

Below are a few specific examples of how money was funneled from the Controllers to the Bolsheviks:

England's Lord Alfred Miller, who was head of the round Table founded by Cecil Rhodes (of Oxford's Rhodes Scholar fame and also a front group for the Rothschilds and predecessor of America's Council on Foreign Relations), sank 21 million rubles into the Bolshevik Revolution.

The American super-industrialists Averill Harriman said in June, 1944 that Joseph Stalin bragged that about 2/3 of all the Russian infrasucture had been built with U.S. aid.

After Lenin was thrown out of the country by Czar Nicholas II, German bankers led by the Warburg family gave him a suitcase filled with $5 million, put him on a second train and shipped him back to Russia to finish his job.

The Washington Post reported on February 2, 1918 that William B. Thompson, director of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, gave the Bolsheviks $1 million!

The first Soviet bank was run by J. P . Morgan through his Guaranty Trust Company.

One of the most glaring examples of how deeply the United States was involved in assisting the Bolshevik Revolution took place at Petrograd in the summer of 1917. Under the guise of a "Red cross" mission, 15 Wall Street financiers, their attorneys, and Federal Reserve Director William Bryce Thompson, along with a small group of doctors and nurses, traveled to the nerve center of the Russian Revolution. Naturally, the businessmen weren't in Petrograd to wrap wounds and take a patient's blood pressure, and when doctors and nurses discovered their true motives, they left.

The only problem was -- the bankers & lawyers remained. And why did they stay? Well Hermann Hagedon, in his biography evidence that J. P. Morgan cabled Thompson $1 million through a branch office in his City National Bank in Petrograd to support the Bolshevik "cause"! These are American businessmen receiving money from J. P . Morgan (the real life "Daddy Warbucks") to help push the Communist cause over the top! It's incredible, especially since Morgan's bank was the only one not nationalized after the Bolshevik Revolution. Also, six of those present in Petrograd (there were Wall Street bankers) later became members of America's Council on Foreign Relations in the 1920s.

In essence, the Controllers -- those in England, America, and Germany -- BOUGHT Russia for the paltry sum of $30-40 million. When you think about how much oil, real estate, and minerals are held within that enormous country, it was the sweetest deal of all time.

Some people may protest, Why would those who supposedly support a Capitalist system want to promote its very antithesis -- Communism?" The answer is simple. What does it matter WHAT a government does if YOU control it?

Can you see? The Controllers have ALWAYS bought and paid for each side of every conflict. That way they never lose! In regard to the Soviet Union, their motive was clear. After the Bolshevik Revolution took place a and a system was set up that epitomized non-productivity and inefficiency, they would always have to rely on the "Capitalists" for a handout (i.e., loans at interest). Thus, whenever it came to money and technology, the Sleeping Bear could always be contained because its very creation came about as a result of the Controllers!

Russia was under their thumb since day one! The same concept applies to our current Welfare state. If we keep down what could potentially be a "threatening" group of people by making them dependent on cash payments and food stamps, they can be contained and made less dangerous.

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net Order the book from American Free Press.

70% of tax revenue spent on war

By Peter Papaherakles

Thursday, August 4, 2001: The United States is getting deeper in debt at a faster rate than ever before, mainly due to the out-of-control spending by the Department of Defense, which really should be called the Dept. of War like it was until 1947. Out of the $2 trillion that is collected from taxpayers every year to cover all the nation's expenses, the War Dept. tales a whopping 70 percent, or $1.4 trillion. As a result we have to needlessly borrow that much every year, thus being forced into bankruptcy.

The international bankers that have taken control of our country know all too well that war is the biggest money maker for them and since their federal Reserve was established in 1913 we have had one war after another resulting in a gargantuan national debt that has been growing exponentially since then. After a century of wars, a mere $2.5 billion debt in 1913 has mushroomed into a $14.5 trillion debt in 2011.

So where does all this money go? Officially, Congress now allocates about $700 billion to the Pentagon. However, there are many war-related expenses that are hidden in other parts of the budget that dramatically increase that figure to as much as $1.4 trillion. The biggest expense is the interest paid on the national debt. Over 90% of the total interest per year, or $431 billion is due too previous war spending. (Note: we are still paying interest on the Korean War.) Another $125 billion goes for veterans affairs including pensions. Homeland Security gets $47 billion, the Energy Department gets another $22 billion, a vague-sounding International Affairs gets $63 billion and the rest goes to miscellaneous other expenses including NASS for satellites, FBI for counterterrorism, ect.

Here are some interesting statists: We spend more on war than the rest of the world combined. The U.S. military has 750 bases around the world in 135 countries, many of which are tiny and not a threat to the U.S.. Do we really need to defend ourselves against Mali, Liechtenstein or Andorra?

The events of 9-11 were a bonanza for the war industry. According to a recent study by Brown University, the U.S. has spent $3.7 trillion on the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the CIA's own admission in London's Financial Times on June 26: "The U.S. government spends $19 billion a month to fight an estimated 50- 75 al Qaeda types in Afghanistan.: The alleged reason for our invasion of that country, Osama bin Laden, was allegedly terminated in Pakistan a couple of months ago. Yet, we continue to be in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Our commander in chief, who was elected to office mainly because he promised to bring the troops home immediately, recently announced that he would bring home 32,000 troops by next September.

A few months ago, the federal government was at risk of actually shutting down because they couldn't agree on how to shave an additional $10 billion off the budget. Yet we spend that much with every passing month in Afghanistan. Of course, the president also did not make clear why we are still leaving 68,000 troops there, along with another 100,000 mercenaries.

It is not only the Department of Defense's outlandish suspending that must be curbed, but also its criminal waste. Beyond the $100 hammers and $500 toilet seats, countless billions are routinely disappearing into the black hole of war spending. Recently, it was admitted that $6.3 billion in cash had vanished in Iraq. Several years ago, during the early years of the Iraq war, however, it was conceded that $ 12 billion in cash had gone missing.

And whatever happened to that $2.3 trillion that was declared unaccounted for the day prior to 9-11 by Donald Rumsfeld? Conveniently 9-11 happened the next day, and taxpayers forgot about the money. That has to be the greatest magic trick of all time.

Pentagon auditors readily admit that 25% of their annual budget, or $175 billion, cannot be located.

The federal government was on the verge of shutting down this spring because they couldn't agree on how to cut a mere $10 billion.

Are these guys politicians, or are they stand-up comedians? It's hard to tell.

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

Obama stimulated bigger catastrophe

Tough Talk From Jim Traficant

Thursday, July 28, 2001: The White House claims its stimulus package energized our economy by creating or saving 2.4 million jobs. the stimulus package cost $878 billion. Once you apply the science of mathematics, you realize that American taxpayers paid $278,000 for every job created. Let me repeat, 278 thousand big ones, folks, for every single one of those economy-stimulating jobs.

If you don't believe me, listen to the Council of Economic Advisors in their seventh quarterly report. They revealed that the widely applauded stimulus added or saved 2.38 million jobs since its introduction in February 2009. But stimulus legislation cost a total of $666 billion to date, or roughly $278,000 per job. What makes this report even more troubling is that more than 50 percent of those $278,000 jobs were created in the service sector.

Let's check out some hard core facts. When stimulus legislation was being debated, the nation's unemployment rate was 7.3 percent. It's now over 9.2. percent. Plus, when Barak Obama (BO) took office in 2009, the national debt was $9,986 trillion. It is now $14,267 trillion and counting.

Our government could have written a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was made possible by the $800 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and still been billions ahead.

In the last two quarters, the U.S. economy has actually lost 288,000 more jobs, leading economists to surmise that this so-called stimulus actually undermined a possible recovery by this date.

Beam me us...then get back at me.

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

U.S. Tortures own soldiers to avoid paying benefits

By Bill White

Tuesday, July 26, 2001: The U.S. military has been using torture against its own troops to punish whistleblowers and disabled soldiers, who attempt to make benefits claims, according to testimony given recently before the Congressional Veterans Affairs sub-committee, which is investigating the abuses.

International outrage and protests have been called against the abuse of Private First Class Bradley Manning, a U.S. Army enlisted man who released video of soldiers murdering 11 people in Iraq, including two journalists with Reuters News Service, to the website Wikileaks. However, new reports have emerged indicating the Army has used similar techniques against soldiers who have been disabled in combat to prevent them from seeking benefits.

Manning, held in solitary confinement for the past 300 days, has been repeatedly brutalized by military officials--often forced to strip naked and then stand at attention for hours--as well as enduring physical torture. These abuses have led to international protest and picketing outside the Quantico Marine base in Virginia where Manning was held. He is now at Ft. Leavenworth, KS.

Now a second soldier, Sgt. Chuck Luther, has stepped forward and testified he was subjected to similar humiliation and abuse after he went to a U.S. Army aid station to receive medical attention.

Luther was injured by an exploding mortar shell and then subsequently developed headaches and other symptoms of brain injury. When he sought medical attention, he told doctors the pain from his injury was so bad he wanted to kill himself. Afterwards, he was placed in an isolation cell on suicide watch--where he was subjected to sleep deprivation and brutally abused and degraded until he agreed to sign papers saying his symptoms were the result of a pre-existing "personality disorder" and that he would be discharged from the Army for that cause.

Luther and others have come to represent the 22,600 U.S. military personnel who have been discharged under false diagnoses of personality disorders after being tortured and coerced into signing false documents. The personality disorder discharge denies all benefits to a vet and prevents the Army from having to provide medical care, thus saving billions in benefits .

The tactic of torturing those who fall into the clutches of the government expanded significantly after the Bush administration used 9-11 as a pretext to establish a torture regime. The FBI, CIA and U.S. military have spent the past 10 years perfecting torture techniques.

Domestically, the use of torture began when the Supreme Court approved the utilizing of long-term "Special Housing Units" against both federal prisoners and pretrial detainees--people who are held by the U.S. because they have been accused, but not convicted, of a crime. The Department of justice now frequently uses torture--both physical and psychological--to obtain false confessions.

Since that time, though, the use of torture has expanded to all federal agencies, particularly the military and intelligences agencies.

What is new here is that the U.S. is torturing its own soldiers, not for political reasons, but merely to save a buck, meaning the country has reached a new low in human degardation.

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

What Do We Owe The Jew Today

By Bill Gibbons

The Populists Viewpoint talks about the Jew and where he stands with God today. We usually talk about the political situation in our messages, but because the Jews are so involved in politics, we want to show you, from the Bible, where they stand with God. Many so-called evangelicals and fundamentalists Christians favor the Jew over all other people and this is not sound Bible doctrine. We will show you that most Jews are the enemy of Jesus Christ and that makes them the enemy of God Almighty, the Father of Jesus Christ and all true believers. We ask you to read this message and check the Bible verses to prove the accuracy of this report. This is not an anti-Semitic message and is not meant to belittle the Jew. We simply want to present Bible facts about the Jews relationship with God in our day.

Most people are confused between the Jews and their proselytes. There is a big difference between the Zionist Jews, which are mostly Jewish proselytes and the true descendants of Jacob. We want to present this message to show the difference and show why we do not owe the Zionist in Israel such devotion as many of you are showing them today, because the leaders of Israel are anti-Christ and no person redeemed by the blood of Jesus Christ is obligated to treat the Jew any different than we would any other people or nation. If you really desire to see where the Jews stands with God; then read this message.

“And I will bless those who bless you, and the ones who curse you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” GE.12: 3.

Let us say up front that we do not hate the Jew as we are often accused of doing, nor are we anti-Semitic. We pity the many Jews that are leading their children to Hell and this is the cruelest thing any man can do. But millions of false teachers are doing the same thing all over the world. We present this study, because of the way many people feel about the Jew and believe that he deserves more than God says he deserves. We ask you to read this with an open mind. We know that it is a hard thing to do, but it is possible. A person that has been redeemed is supposed to believe what God says and we will only; present what God says on this matter. If you can show us we are wrong, then we urge you to do so. gibb@azci.net.

Many fundamentalists in this country point to this one verse in the Word of God as proof that we are obligated to approve of anything the Jews do, because God is blessing us for doing so. Is there any basis for our accepting this reason? Before I go into detail, let me say that there is absolutely no truth to that belief that we owe Israel anything at all.

Let us examine the facts: Matthew Henry, a 17^th century English preacher and well approved of by no less than one of the greatest preachers that ever lived, George Whitefield, had this to say about GE.12: 3: (page 85 of his commentary). “In thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. This was the promise that crowned all the rest; for it points at the Messiah, in whom all the promises are yea and amen. Note, (1.) Jesus Christ is the great blessing of the world, the greatest that ever the world was blessed with. He is a family blessing, by Him salvation is brought to the house (LK.18: 9); when we reckon up or family blessings, let us put Christ in the Imprimis-the first place, as the blessing of blessings. But how are all the families of the earth blessed in Christ, when so many are strangers to Him? Answer, [1.] All that are blessed are blessed in Him, Acts 4: 12. [2.] All that believe, of what family so ever they be, shall be blessed in Him. [3.] Some of all families of the earth are blessed in Him. [4.] There are some blessings which all the families of the earth are blessed with in Christ; for the Gospel salvation is a common salvation, Jude 3. (2.) It is a great honour to be related to Christ; this made Abram’s name great, that the Messiah was to descend from his loins, much more than that he should be the father of many nations. It was Abram’s honour to be His father by nature; it will be ours to be His brethren by grace,” MT.12: 50.” I couldn’t say it any better than Mr. Henry.

Ge.12: 3 is not talking about the Jews as a people, but about Jesus Christ as a Saviour. Before WW II few people thought of GE.12: 3 to mean we are to treat the Jew any better than anyone else. The older preachers did not quoted this verse as meaning that the Jew should have the preeminence over other people. The Thompson Chain Reference Bible, first published in 1908, listed this verse as one of the Messianic Promises. The New Testament does not say that we are to treat the Jew as our betters or to approve of all that they say and do. This verse does not speak as a national blessing, but as a family or personal blessing and there is a great deal of difference as any sane thinking person can easily see.

If this applied to Abraham’s descendants, then it would also apply to Ishmael and his descendants, whom most people believe to be the Arabs, and to the sons of Abraham by his wife Keturah. This verse does not say that only the descendants of Isaac would be a blessing. That is not what the verse plainly states. The Jews or the Arabs have never been a blessing to any family or to any nation. The Zionist Jews have caused trouble in every nation that they have ever lived in and were kicked out of many nations for that reason. Many of the upper crust rich Jews are not satisfied to merely live in a country, their desire is to run the affairs of the countries they live in. (Go to our Conspiracy Articles and The Truth About Zionist pages to see how they manage, with their money, to take over every country they are allowed to live in.) So we can see that Ge.12: 3 is not a promised blessing on this nation for giving the Jews special treatment. We have also seen that this is a promise to all families of the earth: that Jesus Christ is the blessing promised here and not the Jews.

What, then, is the meaning of GE.12: 3? That is an easy question and we will now answer the question. We will, first, answer the question, and then we will elaborate on our answer. First this verse promises that anyone that rejects Jesus Christ will be cursed forever, while anyone that accepts Him will be blessed forever. If you accept that this verse is talking about Jesus Christ, and you must do that; then you must accept the fact that this, rather then being a blessing on the Jew is actually a curse on the Jew, BECAUSE MOST JEWS HAVE REJECTED CHRIST AS SAVIOUR. Can anyone argue that they have not rejected Him? Since they have rejected Christ as their Saviour they have rejected Him and God has cursed the unsaved Jew and that is the plain teaching of this verse.

What did the Jews say and do the day Christ died? “And then Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but rather that a riot was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the multitude, saying, I am innocent of this Man’s blood: see to that yourselves” MT.27: 24. The literal translation here is “the blood of this righteous man.” Pilate was right in saying that, but was wrong in allowing Him to be crucified from the standpoint of his being the ruler over Israel. We know of course that Christ had to be crucified and God allowed Pilate to make that crucial decision. The Jews replied, “And all the people answered and said, His blood be on us and on our children” verse 25. That is a Bible fact of what was said and done on that faithful day by the Jews.

We do not blame today’s Jews for what happened that day, because they were not there and should not have to share the blame for what their ancestors said and did. But, and this is most important; many Jews have been teaching their children ever since that fateful day: that Jesus Christ is not God and for that we do have to blame them, because they are leading their children to Hell. For that they deserve, not praise and honor, but only condemnation. Now I have a question for you who believe that we owe the Jews something special; how can you praise and honor a man that leads his children to Hell, with all the Bible facts available before him? If you can still honor such a man, then you had better check out your own salvation, because there is something wrong with it.

What does God have to say to a man that denies that Christ is Lord God Almighty? This is God’s answer and should be good enough for anyone: “Who is a liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son” 1 JN.2: 22. There you have the answer, now what will you do with the Word of God on this matter? God says that such a person is antichrist. Will you defy God and still say that God demands that you give the Jew special treatment, when God Himself says he is antichrist. The antichrist is the Lord’s enemy and should be your enemy. To be silent about Christ and just ignore Him is one thing, but to deny that He is God as the Jew, the Muslim, the Hindu, the Buddhist, and a host of other false religions do is to be allied with the antichrist. The Bible asked the question, “Who is on the Lord’s side”, and I ask you the same question are you on the Lord’s side or on the side of antichrist? You cannot be on both sides; you must choose which side you are on. The Bible also says. “Choose ye this day whom you will serve.” Do you really think God will bless you; if you continue to praise His enemies and the unsaved Jew is His enemy as much to day as he was the day his ancestors crucified the Lord of Glory? I don’t see how He can bless you. Take a look at New Orleans, was God blessing that wicked city when Hurricane Katrina struck? What about the Pacific earthquakes and the tsunamis that have killed thousands of people and left nuclear fall-out that will contaminate much of the earth?

In second Chronicles, King Jehoshaphat went up north to help Israel’s King Ahab in his battle with Ramoth-gilead, because he had married into the family of Ahab. This is where Ahab was killed. When King Jehoshaphat returned home, Jehu the prophet met him and said, “….Should you help the wicked and love those who hate the Lord and so bring wrath on yourself from the Lord?” 2 CHR. 19:2. What was Jehu’s question? Should you help them that hate the Lord? Keep in mind that the kingdom of Israel consisted of the ten tribes that broke away at the death of Solomon and formed the kingdom of Israel, while the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin remained as the kingdom of Judea. The ten tribes were the sons of Jacob as much as the two tribes were; yet God calls them the wicked. He called them the wicked, because they kicked God out of Israel and established a false religion and that is one of the worst sins a human being can commit. What did Jehu say could happen to Judah? The wrath of God could descend upon them for helping God’s enemy. The same thing can happen to us today for all the ways in which we have helped Israel, because, today, Israel is the enemy of God, just as Israel was in the days of Jehoshaphat. All Jews that reject Jesus Christ as God are God’s enemies. Can you tell me that the Jew has not rejected Christ as God!

I believe that this establishes the Bible fact that God considers the unsaved Jew His wicked enemy. I cannot see how anyone can fail to get the same impression from the Word of God. Anyone that rejects Jesus Christ as God and leads his children to Hell is God’s mortal enemy, because Jesus Christ died that they might be saved: "And she shall bring forth a Son, and thou shalt call His name JESSUS: for He shall save His people from their sins." MT. 1:21 That makes the unsaved Jew His enemy just as much as the Muslim, the Hindu, the Buddhist or any other false religion. God considers the false prophet his number one enemy, because they do not teach that Christ, His beloved Son, died on the cruel cross to save mankind. After what Christ went through for man, for man to reject Christ is a mortal and fatal sin, and a slap in God’s face. This is what the unsaved Jew is guilty of doing. Therefore we ask YOU, how can the Jew be your friend, when he is the enemy of your Saviour, and your God?

Israel is not cast away for good, but will come back into the picture when the times of the Gentiles are full: “For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery. Lest you be wise in your own estimation that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in” RO.11: 25. You need to read all of Romans chapter eleven to get the full picture of where the Jew stands with God today and what the future holds for them. When all true believers have been taken out of the world at the Lord’s second coming, the Jews will come back into the picture, but not until that happens. Today a few Jews may have been saved, while many have, as has many Gentiles have, made a profession of faith, and only God knows if such professions are for real.

Let us briefly summaries Romans eleven and see where we are. Paul said he was of the tribe of Benjamin and that God had preserved for Himself a remnant at that time, just as He did in the days of Elijah: “Lord they have killed Thy prophets, they have torn down Thine altars, and I alone am left, and they are seeking my life. But what is the divine response to him? I have kept for myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal” RO.11: 3, 4. so God will always have a remnant available to do His bidding.

Paul goes on to say in verse seven, “What then? That which Israel is seeking for, it has not obtained, but those who were chosen obtained it, and the rest were hardened.” So the chosen of God obtained salvation, while the rest were hardened. All this is according to the foreknowledge of God. Those who were opposed to God already, He hardened even more. This just goes to show, that it is a dangerous thing to oppose God and to support the Jews and Israel as many have is to oppose God. Now then, I don't know about you, but I don't want God angry with me.

Now because the Jews rejected Christ, God opened the way for the Gentiles to be able to come to know Christ. For this, I, Bill Gibbons, will forever be grateful and so should you. Paul said in verse 15: “For if their rejection be the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead.” He goes on to tell how the original branches were cut off and the wild Gentile branches were grafted into the good olive tree and tells us not to be arrogant.

In verses 19, and 20, Paul says, “You will say then, Branches were broken off that I might be grafted in. Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear.” God did not spare the natural branches, the Jews, because of their unbelief and He will not spare us if we turn away from Him as most people have in this country today.

“Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, (the Jews), severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness, otherwise you also will be cut off” verse 22. The Gentiles will surely be cut off at the rapture of the Church. Does this mean that no Gentile will be saved during the tribulation? We cannot say for sure, but it would seem to mean that, since we have had all this time to claim Him as our Saviour.

“And they also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in; for God is able to graft them back in again” verse 23. But it is God that must graft them back in. It seems to us, that the modern church members are trying to graft the Jews back in before God is ready to graft them back in, and that will never work, because the church has no ability to graft them back in. They will remain out until God is ready to graft them back in Himself.

Paul says in verse 26, 27 that all Israel will be saved: “….The deliverer will come from Zion, He will remove ungodliness from Jacob. And this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.” And he continues in verse 28: “From the standpoint of the Gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers.” Paul says that we were once disobedient to God, but have been shown mercy because of their disobedience. Paul goes on to say: that, in the future, the Jews will be blessed for their fathers sake.

Because God showed us, mercy, He will also show them mercy again. “For God has shut up all in disobedience that He might show mercy to all. O, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His way! For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who became His Counselor? Or who has first given to Him that it might be paid back to Him again? For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever. Amen” RO.11; 33-36. Indeed God is just and will always do what is right.

Let us summaries what we already know:

First: We know that most Jews rejected Christ as their Messiah and Saviour. God gave them another forty years to repent after they crucified the Lord and a chance to accept Him. But instead of accepting Him as their Saviour, they persecuted His Church. This was the final insult to God, because to touch one of God’s people, is to touch the “Apple of God's Eye.” For this cause God cut off the Jewish branch. Now what happens when a branch is cut off? IT DIES. As far as God is concerned, the Jew is dead, whether you like it or not. Can we agree on that?

Next: God grafted the Gentiles into the good olive tree and the Gentile believers replaced the Jews in God’s eye and Paul could say of the Church, “According as He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love” EP.1: 4. Now, we see that the Church: that is, only redeemed believers are the chosen of God and the Jew has been set aside. In one sense this has always been the case; the chosen have always been the redeemed. Are you with me so far? You should be.

Next: We see that anyone that rejects Christ is a liar and an anti-Christ, ““Who is a liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son” 1 JN.2: 22. John could say this, because the great Majority of Jews had rejected Christ and became His mortal enemies. You must agree that anyone that rejects Christ as Saviour and teaches their children that there is no God is the enemy of God. The question then is this: Would God bless anyone that denies that Jesus Christ, His Son, is the Saviour of mankind. Stop for one minute and think, how do you feel about that?

Also: With this in mind, we see GE. 12: 3, as a curse against Israel and not a blessing for God will not bless a nation of anti-Christ. Here is what GE. 12: 3 says, “And I will bless them that bless thee and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” God blesses nations depending on how the people in that nation live their lives. If a nation commits great sins against God, and worships other gods, as many in this nation have, God will not bless that nation no matter how many Jews may live in that nation or how well the people of that nation treats the Jew. It is gross sins that cause a nation to be punished by God and not how they treat the Jew.

You may disagree with this message, if so we would welcome any comments, provided they are sent with Scriptural proof of our error. Don’t just tell us we are wrong; show us with Scripture and verse. gibb@azci.net

At a meeting of 500 so-called evangelicals, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had this to say, "When you support Israel, you don’t have to choose between your interests and your values; you get both." He continued with this remark, The prime minister encouraged the conference attendees to not only think of Israel as an ally of the Unites States, but as indistinguishable from it. "Our enemies think that we are you, and that you are us," added Netanyahu. "And you know something? They are absolutely right."

News commentator Glenn Beck worked the audience into a frenzy, decrying the historical persecution of Jews, insisting that Israel cannot cede control over territories it controls, and calling upon the conference attendees to declare that they, too, are Jewish.

"Jews have been chased out of every corner of this planet," said Beck. "Enough is enough." Beck said that new states can be established, but not at the expense of other states, and that Israel is historically the 'Land of the Jews', implying that Israel should not relinquish control over the West Bank in order to create a State of Palestine.

Beck repeated a refrain that Netanyahu had introduced earlier, appealing to audience members to self-identify as Israelis and Jews themselves. He exhorted, "When we see Israelis not as part of us, but as us, we can move to the next level as human beings," adding, "Let us declare 'I am a Jew,' they cannot kill all of us"

We remind these two men: that God cannot and will not bless any people that reject Jesus Christ as Saviour and teach their children the same, therefore leading them all to Hell. I am truly amazed that anyone is not able to see the truth in what the Bible says on this subject. God blesses nations according to how they live their lives. The more sins a people commit the less God is going to bless them. If a nation rejects Jesus Christ as Saviour and lives a wicked life, God will not bless that nation, no matter how well they treat the Jews.

Bill Gibbons is a semi-retired Fundamental Minister of the Gospel and political activist. He is the former publisher of the Spirit of Elijah, editor of the Good News Bulletin, author of two fiction novels, THE NEW AMERICAN REVOLUTION and the AMERICAN GESTAPO. He has written hundreds of articles for newspapers and web sites. He is a political POPULIST; a populist is one who believes in AMERICA FIRST, not last like our modern politicians. He believes that America is a REPUBLIC, not a democracy. A REPUBLIC is a nation where the laws are set in stone and cannot be tampered with by politicians, as our Constitution directs. A DEMOCRACY is a form of government where the unwashed rabble can vote themselves huge largess from the public treasure. Bill no longer accepts speaking engagements, because of his advanced age. He can be reached at gibb@azci.net . His web site, THE POPULISTS AMERICAN is located at http:// aclean-sweep.com . His FEATURE STORIES and ZIONISM EXPOSED pages are the outstanding feature of his web site. He has from ten to twenty NEWS UPDATES daily except Sat & Sun.

"Sometimes you must get a little loud, give it to them raw and unrehearsed to get their attention"! General George S. Patton

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

The following is a few paragraphs from Dirty Secrets, available from American Free Press

The CIA's role in JFK'S Assassination

By Victor Thorn

Friday, July 15, 2011: The vital point being made, and one confirmed by the Church Committee in 1975 {The referral is to U.S. Senator Church], was that a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy did exist, and that it extended directly into the U.S. government. To fully understand the ramifications of this information, one needs to be aware of what the CIA has been doing since it formed out of the OSS after WWII. Although time prevents me from engaging in a lengthy discourse, you should research "Project Paperclip" where Nazi scientists were secretly relocated to America after the war. You can also investigate the CIA's illegal mind control experiments, their illicit drug test on unwitting subjects, their drug trafficking activities, how they've successfully infiltrated the American corporate media, and their assassinations of various world leaders. In other words, these guys have, and still are, dirty up to their eyeballs.

To fully understand not only this branch of intelligence, but also a boarder spectrum of how our world works, we need to realize that what is depicted on the nightly news is not an accurate representation of reality. Rather, the true impetus, or driving force behind our global political system, is rarely ever seen by the American public. The real decision-makers lurk in the shadows, plotting and planning, the use their 'operational arms' such as the CIA, Mossad, other intelligence agencies, and Organized Crime to do their bidding. As Michael Collins Piper tells us, these groups--the money launderers, drug dealers, killers and crooks--are the only entities to operate outside of societal laws and mores. The controllers--international bankers, heads of multinational corporations, and top ranking members of secret societies--"guide" our world, then use their "implementers" to carry forth their decisions. Politicians are one of the "guises" used in front of the scenes, while the CIA, Mossad, and Mob take care of their dirty dealings far-removed from public scrutiny. I am sorry to say, but this is the way our world operates.

One of the primary reasons that John Kennedy got assassinated was because he dared to interfere with this tenuous framework of power. More specifically, JFK, realized how out-of-control these various agencies were, wanted to reign then in and bring them all under one roof, giving his brother Bobby jurisdiction over all of them. He also planned on getting rid of master-manipulator J. Edgar Hoover (who was very aware of their plans, but out of sheer self-interest had no incentive to uncover the truth about Kennedy's murder). To make matters worse for himself, Kennedy fired CIA Director Allen Dulles, who was one of the dirtiest wheeler-dealers of all-time. (Incredibly, Dulles would later serve on the Warren Commission! Talk about having the deck stacked against you).

Arthur Krock wrote in The New York Times about this battle between Kennedy and the CIA on October 3, 1963, saying that the CIA "represents a tremendous power and total unaccountability to anyone." Krock also referred to someone close to Kennedy in the White House who said that if anyone ever tried to take over the U.S. Government, it would be the CIA, and that JFK was no longer able to keep them in reins. Now remember, this was only a month-and-a-half before that fateful day in Dallas.

Reinforcing how out-off-control the CIA was at this time, attorney and researcher Mark Lane wrote in The Spotlight on February 17, 1992, "President Kennedy sent Henry Cabot Lodge, his Ambassador to Vietnam, with orders to the CIA on two separate occasions and in both cases the CIA ignored these orders, saying that it was different from what the agency thought should be done. In other words, the CIA had decided that it--not the president--would make the decisions as to how American foreign policy should be conducted."

Is this situation starting to become clear to you? Can you see to what proportions the CIA had grown? Kennedy was treading through very treacherous waters, but the straw that broke the camel's back was only reported years later by The New York Times on April 25, 1966. It seems that Kennedy was so intent on exercising his ELECTED powers and not allow them to be usurped by power-crazed individuals in the intelligence community that he threatened to "splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the wind." By uttering these words, Kennedy's fate was sealed, for now he had struck at the very core of the Controllers' power center!

In essence, Michael Collins Piper points out that Kennedy had done, or intended to do, four things that filled the CIA with rage: 1) Fired Allen Dulles. 2) Was in the process of founding a panel that would investigate the CIA's numerous crimes. 3) Put a damper on the breadth and scope of the CIA. 4) Limit their ability to act under National Security Memoranda 55. Colonel Fletcher Prouty spoke of the CIA's reaction. "Nothing I had ever been involved with in my entire career had created such an uproar. NSAM 55 stripped the CIA of its cherished covert operations goal, except for some small actions. It was an explosive document. The military-industrial complex was not pleased."

One of these incensed individuals was CIA Chief of Counter-Intelligence, James Jesus Angleton. Assuming this post in 1954 under the guidance of two truly dirty dogs--Allen Dulles and Richard Helms--Peter Dale Scott wrote in Deep Politics and the Death of JFK that Angleton "managed a 'second CIA' within the CIA." Angleton operated so far beyond his legal parameters that he, along with William Harvey, formed the ZR/Rifle Team and hired the shooters who were to take out Cuban leader Fidel Castro. And although I won't delve into details at this point, Piper points out in Final Judgment that these were the same trigger men used for the Kennedy Assassination.

MORE importantly, Angleton formed an extremely close relationship with the Mossad and David Ben-Gurion, and was fully aware of the Israeli Prime Minister's hatred for JFK. Angleton became so intimate with the Israeli's that he even helped them develop their secret nuclear program, while the CIA and Mossad became as one in the Middle East--a virtual indistinguishable entity working in unison to carry out their mutual goals.

The Mossad, you must know, has been called by Michael Collins Piper "the driving force behind the conspiracy" to kill JFK. Andrew Cockburn, appearing on C-Span's Booknotes on September 1, 1991, described their relationship with American intelligence. "There has been since almost the earliest days of the CIA a secret bond, basically by which Israeli intelligence did jobs for the CIA and the rest of American intelligence. You can't understand what's going on with American covert operations and the Israeli covert operations until you understand this secret arrangement.

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

EASY SOULTION TO GREEK WOES: REPUDIATE ITS UNPAYABLE DEBT

By Peter Papaherakles

As Greece is being led into financial enslavement by a corrupt government n bed with the global banking cartels, increasing numbers of economists are saying that rather than sinking into debt it can never repay, Greece should take control of its destiny and repudiate the unconstitutional debt that it has been saddled with. (The U.S. should pay attention and repute their own debt-ED).

Although writers in the alternative press have been floating this suggestion for months, mainstream economists are also starting to say the same thing lately. On June 16, even Allen Mattich of the Wall Street Journal wrote an article entitles "Greece May View Euro Exit; Debt Default as Best Option in Financial Crisis." Mittich stated, "Greeks are growing fed up with austerity and seem unwilling to take on the still stricter conditions, being demanded of them. Were Greeks to decide that a euro-exit was not only possible, but desirable, the core EU, led by Germany, would almost certainly make huge concessions, including debt forgiveness. A Greek default and departure from the euro would risk a systemic crisis across Europe's financial sector."

Economic analyst Max Keiser calls the bankers criminals and suggest that Greece bring back the drachma. He sees what is going on in Greece as part of a worldwide problem of unscrupulous bankers conquering the world through debt.

Debtocracy, a new documentary film by Costas Lapavitsas, an economist and professor in London, makes the best case for repudiating the debt. According to reports, over a million Greeks have seen it in the Internet. A very well made film, it introduces the concept of "odious debt," established in the 1920s by Russian economist Alexander Sack. Several countries have used the concept to repudiate unconditional debts throughout history, including Ecuador, which only paid 20 cents on the dollar to cover its debt a few years ago. When the U.S. occupied Iraq in 2003, they inherited a $120 billion debt that Iraq owed to France and Russia. The debt was declared odious and the U.S. did not have to repay a dime.

An odious debt conforms to three qualifications: a) The government received the loan without the people's approval; b) The loan was spent for activities not beneficial to the people; and c) The lender was aware of the above yet lent the money anyway, thus committing a hostile act against the people of the target country.

In Greece's case, the whole financial crisis was created by fraud between Wall Street, and the IMF, European bankers and corrupt Greek politicians over the past decade. The Greek people clearly do not benefit from thee loans as they merely serve interest on previous loans. As a mater of fact, no real money was ever loaned. Rather, ledger entries were made marking interest payments as paid. Not a penny of the $150 billion has actually gone to help the people of Greece. Finally, the lenders were well aware of what was being done because they were complicit in defrauding the people of Greece.

The entire financial crisis was manufactured and sold to the public through hype created by the banker-owned international media, with politicians playing scripted roles. The whole thing is a Hollywood production, with the people of Greece serving as hapless victims. If the U.S. government doesn't dramatically curb its spending, we'll be the victims in a future episode.

The banker-owned media places the blame on a bloated bureaucracy and crippled tax system. The clever PHGS acronym (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Spain) was crafted to convey the misconception that Greece and other countries are lazy gluttons that squandered mountains of cash. Debtocracy documents how bankers and politicians engage in wasteful projects in which they benefit while bringing Greece to bankruptcy. These include bribes and kickbacks from German conglomerate Siemens to build the Athens subway system, in addition to huge spending for the 2004 Olympics. Even worse was many millions for high-prices weapons like airplanes and submarines bought from European manufacturers owned by the same bankers. This type of fiscal manipulation is text-book Economic Hitman material as described by John Perkins.

Greece is the canary in the mine in a bankers' end game. If Greece goes down, it won't be long before our turn comes.

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

Texe Marrs: Uncensored

By Victor Thorne

Sunday, July 10, 2011: "With over a thousand newsletters, books, videos and audio recordings, Texe Marrs is undoubtedly the most prolific conspiracy researcher in history."

These words appear in the recently published Conspiracy Hall of Fame, and with the release of his latest offering--Conspiracy of the Six Pointed Star--Narrs is keeping his legacy alive and thriving.

During a June 1, interview with this writer, Marrs examined the historical impact that Jews, Zionist, Israel and the Rothschilds have had on the world. Starting with the founder of communism, the Austin-based author explains, "Karl Marx not only effected the fate of Europe, but also America because the Jews and Israel are fountains of communism."

In this light, Marrs continued, "The very religion of Judaism is a racist form of communism. As such, one of Marx's premier goals was the emancipation of mankind whereby communism would be used to erase all borders and cast nationalism as a disease to be eradicated."

His analysis led to the following insight: "The Jew is already emancipated because--at least during Marx's time before the creation of Israel--they had no connection with nations or nationalism. Today, American Jews have no patriotic love of the U.S. Their allegiance is solely to Israel. Under World Jewry, it matters not where you're born, only that you identify as a Jew."

To bring this notion full circle, Marrs stated, "Marx sought to emancipate people from nationalism and love of country. If communism equals Judaism, we should be especially wary of how a Chicago judge named Abner Mikva referred to Barak Obama as America's first Jewish president."

Segueing into this topic, Marrs elaborated, "We know that our president was brought into power by a swindler's list: Bernanke, Geithner and Rahm Emanuel."

In regard to the Middle East, Marrs is convinced that Obama is selling out the Palestinians: "Only a man with a middle name like 'Hussein' who attended a Muslim school and had a Muslim father and stepfather could build these types of faux bridges. But it it's all propaganda."

Marrs provided further details. "The Protocols authorize the use of theater, force and make-believe, and that's what we're seeing today in U.S foreign policy in the Middle-East. Obama tripled military aid to Israel, gave them assurance at his recent speech, and has voted in the U.N. against any recognition of the Palestinians."

As a result, Marrs asserts, "The Obama administration and Israel will always team together to keep Palestine and apartheid, open-air concentration camp with Jewish guards."

When viewing the congressional reaction to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's May 24 appearance on Capitol Hill, Marrs again drew comparisons to communism. "What we're facing now is an equivalent to the days of Joseph Stalin and his Presidium speeches. Our 535 senators and representatives gave Netanyahu--the head of worlds Jewry-- a hero's welcome. Their applause was almost deafening as they rose for 29 standing ovations. Not one Republican or Democrat refused to clap. There was no opposition from anyone, including Ron and Rand Paul."

In Conspiracy of the Six-Pointed Star, Marrs analyzes the consequences faced by presidents such as John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon after they bucked the Israeli lobby. It's no different today.

"Our elected leaders face horrible threats if they do anything perceived as negative to Israeli interests," Marrs proclaimed. "AIPAC definitely has watchers, and the Russian Politburo of old now has an equivalent in the U.S.A. It's called Congress."

Many recent presidents have fallen into this tangled web. For example, Marrs noted, "Monica Lewinsky was a Jewish 'Mata Hari' spy of the Mossad placed in the White House by Rahm Emanuel. Then, a few years ago, Clinton reportedly had an affair with Liza Belzberg [who was married to Matthew Bronfman]. The Bronfman's were upset about this tryst, which could explain why Hillary--who is half Jewish on her mother's side--lost to Obama. Clinton couldn't make it up to them, even when declaring during a speech that if Israel was ever attacked, he'd fight and die for them on the front lines."

Marrs next turned his attention to George W. Bush:"He's not a Christian Zionist, he's a Zionist that mocks Christianity by saying he's a Christian," Marrs clarified.

He then relayed a fascinating tale. "Prior to becoming Texas governor, Bush's handlers urged him to 'go Christian' in order to distract attention away from his sordid past of drinking and using cocaine. So, he appealed to the faithful by saying that only Christians could reach Heaven. But after he eyed the White House, the ADL's Abraham Foxman said that Jews would never support him unless Bush renounced this statement."

It gets even more interesting. Marrs continued, "Foxman and Bush proceeded to sign a written contract whereby the future president would never again say that Jesus was the only way to Heaven. Only after signing this agreement did the ADL bestow their blessings on Bush and endorse him."

Finally, it's still uncertain whether Sarah Palin will run for the presidency in 2012, but as Marrs observed, "She's a fanatical Zionist with blind ambition, and she knows that Israel is the pathway to power. If elected, I wouldn't doubt that within six months she'd order an attack on Iran using some type of rigged intel reports."

"DIRTY SECRETS"

Monday, June 27, 2011: The following messages is taken from "DIRTY SECRETS" By Victor Torn and is well worth the few minutes it will take you to read it - ED. Available from American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

Although the Islamic faith s strong in Malaysia, many Malaysians--and this will surprise many Americans--are quite suspicious of hard-line Islamic fundamentalism, and even question whether Osama bin Laden is "for real."

That is--to put it bluntly--many Malaysians (as do many people in the Islamic Middle East, for example) suspect that bin Laden is actually a creature of Israel's intelligence service, the Mossad, and its allies in various elements of the U.S. national security, and that bin Laden has been a useful tool in a covert campaign to establish a world hegemon under the domination of the Zionist elements and is collaborators in the international super-capitalists community.

In my various presentations in Malaysia, I emphasized the role of the media monopoly in the United States is shaping American policy, pointing out that while in many countries the government controls the media, in the United States, the owners of the media--a small, tightly knit group of families and financial interest--exercise their power to control the government, and thereby the politicians, and the agenda they carry out. The Malaysian people had no trouble in understanding this concept, although many Americans have yet to recognize this reality.

Uniformly. my Malaysian audiences asked: "What will it take to break this media power and the consequences it entails?"

My answer was this: "Although Americans as a whole remain largely ignorant of what is happening, they are, in increasing numbers, thanks to independent voices such as American Free Press, opening their eyes. In the meantime, there are growing numbers of good, patriotic Americans inside the State Department, the military, the CIA and other intelligences agencies , and elsewhere, who are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with 'politics as usual' and beginning to speak out, questioning the global intentions of the Zionist lobby.

"Ultimately", I concluded, "these opinion-makers will begin to make their voices heard more and more. And that's why not only the American people--but people around the world--need to support not only independent media voices, but those in positions of power in the United States and elsewhere who are prepared to speak out, the consequences be dammed."

In that regard, it's probably no coincidence that just as I was about to depart Malaysia, word came that there had been a long-standing FBI inquiry into the activities of the Israeli lobby and its ties with neo-conservative trouble-makers inside the Bush administration. It was almost as if this was positive confirmation that there are those who do dare to speak out.

The final outcome of this investigation--and subsequent events--remain to be seen, but America's real patriots can rest assured that they have the friendship of real patriots in Malaysia, and everywhere else around the globe; the media monopoly's claim that "the rest of the world hates us" notwithstanding.

**********************************************************

We have been watching the pundits and reading what they have to say and many of these so-called experts, actually believe that Obama could be re-elected. I suppose this is possible, because no one running for the Republican nomination is worth the powder and lead it would take to blow them up. The people mentioned as a possible candidate will be as bad as Obama and perhaps even worse and I know many of you believe that no one could be any worse than Obama. BUT: Remember, many of us thought no one could be worse than George Bush, yet Obama is beginning to make Bush look good in many ways.

We repeat what we have said many times: Any person with lots of campaign money to spend will not support an honest person and patriots should not even consider voting for such people. Any person that gets mentioned and given free publicity by the corrupt major media is also an enemy of freedom and cannot be trusted.

We must face the facts: The SUPER-RICH and the corrupt major media along with the Judas goats posing as patriotic web sites have us in a bind and there is no way out for us. The media guides the sheep in how they should think and the sheep go along with their guide. The corrupt major media goes a long way in their effort to influence the independent voters to favor the Democrats and the so-called moderate Republicans. The media knows, that the Democrats and Republicans will vote for their candidate, so it is the independents that swing elections and the independents are not well enough informed to make intelligent choices.

To make matters even worse, most people have left God out of the picture altogether and God is getting very angry at the people all over the world. Many of you will not agree with me, but the Bible backs me up when I say: That nothing happens that God does not allow to happen. The further people drift away from God, the worse conditions will get. We saw these terrible disasters in New Orleans, Haiti, In the Pacific tsunami, and earthquake and tsunami in Japan, just to name a few terrible disasters. We have seen these disasters all over this beloved land We have seen terrible floods, forest fires, major oil spills and tornadoes all over the South. This is a Holy God shaking His mighty fist at a sinful people as the only way He has of letting us know that He is angry with us. GOD CONTROLS EVERYTHING and only a genuine return to God can this nation be spared the major disaster that awaits us and this desaster will be our total loss of freedom and the death of millions of our people. Some people think they want a nation without God. Some day God is going to withdraw altogether, then all hell will break loose and the people will hate such a world. Americans must repent before it is to late or there will be NOHOPE FOR US. - Bill Gibbons

It is time for the American people to get up off their knees

Monday, April 11 2011: What ever happened to the Spirit of 76? What would the country's founders think of the wimps that are living in this country that they gave so much to leave to us? They had the courage to throw the rascals out of the country. They said, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH" and went to war against the most powerful country in the world at that time. They did this; knowing that to fail meant torture, imprisonment or death. But they were tired of being on their knees before tyrants and decided they preferred death to spending the rest of their lives on their knees.

They won the war and sent the tyrants packing. These same tyrants came back again in 1812 and the brave American whipped their buts again. But the tyrant did not give up, the tyrant was still determined to bring us back to our knees. The tyrant began, secretly, to plot to overthrow our way of life.

The Rothschild's, the most evil family in the world had sent 20,000 mercenaries to America to fight for the British and they never forgave us for that insult to their pride of always getting they way. They sent agents over here with suitcases full of money and began to buy our politicians at all levels of government. This they were very successful at doing this, because they had plenty of experience by doing the same thing all over Europe.

In 1913 foreigners, under the Rothschild's, took over our banking system and called it the Federal Reserve Bank. Seven of the ten Federal Reserve Banks owners are foreigners, which means that foreigners have been running our country since that blackest of all days in our countries history. This means that foreigners control our finances and our monetary policies. That was the beginning of the end for the American Republic. ALL congressmen and senators that allow this situation to continue are TRAITORS. What else can you call a person who allowes foreigners to control so much of their governments finances and policies?

Americans used to be strong and patriotic. When the first world war in Europe was at a stalemate, American gi's went to Europe and defeated the Germans to end the war. But the politicians made the peace so hard on Germany, that the seeds for WW II was planted and the war came in Europe in1939.

The great majority of American were totally opposed to this war and said, "Let the Europeans fight it out among themselves." But the cunning Rothschild agent, Franklin D. Roosevelt, tricked the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor and dragged us into another useless war. The hearty Americans rose to the occasion and helped the Europeans defeat Germany and Japan. Millions of service personnel along with many civilians were slaughtered on both sides. Who really benefited from this disastrous war? The evil bankers and the owners of the armament factories and all the others who provided fighting tools to the military: such as food , clothing, shoes and all the other things the military needed besides tanks, planes, guns and bullets. Many became millionaires during that war. I saw 65 sailors die fighting five Jap kamikaze planes at Okinawa, in a battle that lasted about five minutes.

Since the end of WW II, the criminals that we have elected have tightened the noose around our necks until we can hardly breath. They have destroyed our economy and transferred our industrial might to Communist China, Americas sworn enemy, until China will soon be able to challenges us and probably defeat us in any war that may start.

What are we to do? We can't change things at the ballot box, because an honest person cannot get elected. If an honest person does slip through the net, they will only last one term, because the money men that pay for elections and their allies, the corrupt major media, will drive them from office. We sent one hundred new congressmen to Washington in the last election, but that still left 335 old congressmen in office and these are some of the most corrupt people in the country. These evil men and women will not surrender one inch to these new people, we can't even be sure the new people are any different then the people they replaced. So you can see how hopeless the situation is.

How much longer will the American people remain on their knees before this evil bunch of swine that have ceased control of our government. Will we have the courage to follow the example set by the Arabs in the Middle East and rise up against these modern day tyrants? At this time, this seems to be the only solution to our problems. Think about that and get back to us. - Bill Gibbons.

Common sense in today's world

Tuesday, April 5, 2011: This humble writer is 84 years old and still going strong. I have been at war with enemies of this nation since 1943, when I left school to join the navy. I never returned to school, which left me with a 9th grade education. I succeeded in life with this handicap, because I had COMMON SENSE. Common sense is lacking in most individuals in this day and age. Many patriots are far more educated then I am, but have far less common sense. Common sense tells me to not trust anyone connected with ANY major media outlet, like ABC, CBS. NBC, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, FOX TELEVISION, TBS or any media outlet operating on the national level.

For example: Fox television, which is supposed to be a conservative network, presenting a different view. Common sense tells me to beware of this network and ALL those connected with the network, which includes ALL the talking heads and I do mean ALL.

Rupert Murdoch is the FRONT man for Fox television. I say front man, because he is only a puppet, financed in the beginning by our nations worst enemies, which includes the Rothschild family of Europe, the Bronfman family of Canada and the Rockefeller family of America. Common sense tells me that nothing good could ever come of such a network, yet many people have been fooled into believing that Fox television is on the side of freedom loving people, while nothing could be further from the truth.

Murdoch came to America from Australia, where he owned the AUSTRALIAN Newspaper, which is the most liberal, socialists, communist newspaper in Australia. Common sense tells me two things. First: No one owning a single newspaper in Australia, could suddenly have enough money to start a television network, and buy up everything in sight, like TV Guide, major newspapers and magazines and start a weekly "Conservative" newspaper and put the son of a former communist in charge of the paper. Second: A man owning the most liberal, socialists, communist newspaper in Australia, would not come to America and become a conservative over night and start Fox News and claim to present "FAIR AND BALANCED NEWS". Common sense tells us that a leopard does not change his spots. And common sense tells us that The Rothschild's, Bronfman's and Rockefeller's would not finance a news network that opposes their goals of totally dominating ALL television news and all other news outlets they could possible control. Therefore: anyone that believes that Fox Television is a conservative network is simply not using common sense. - Bill Gibbons

Washington Hypocrisy: Some food for thought

Wednesday, March 30, 2011: It would be funny, if it was not so serious. With the Arab uprisings across the Middle East and the U.S. supported tin-pot dictators fighting back to keep control of their countries with violence against their people, Obama decries violence against civilians and declares that the dictators must go.

It takes practice to say such a thing without laughing out loud. Others, like war-mongers Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman jump on the bandwagon with their own pious words. The war-mongers in both political parties get in their own two cents worth. Only a moron can believe anything a politician says, based on their voting records for more wars in the Middle East. Our wars of aggression could be stopped: IF Congress would simply refuse to fund these wars. Remember, these wars are being fought on credit, because the U.S. BROKE. Remember: only the rich profit from war, while the poor pay with their lives.

Since 9-11, the so-called allies have killed over a million Arabs civilians, wounded millions more and displaced more millions in unnecessary wars of aggression against Arab nations. After all this bloodshed, we are supposed to believe that Washington politicians are concerned about the death of civilians in these uprisings.

Now then: I have said that to say this: How do you think Obama, state Governors and city Mayors with their many swat teams and baton carrying bullies called police would react, if the American people would follow the lead of the Arabs and rebel against the U.S. government? I can tell you what their reactions would be: They would call out the military, their goon squads, their swat teams and use all the force they could muster to put down such an uprising and they would not hesitate to kill as many civilians as they could to keep control of the governments around the country.

How many of you remember the governments reaction to the family of the little Gonzales kid, fleeing Castro's Cuba, whose mother gave her life to get him to freedom in the U.S.? The jack-booted thugs invaded the home where the kid was living. roughed up members of his family, terrorized everyone and stuck a gun in the face of that little kid scaring him half to death. All this was unnecessary, because the family did not resist in any way. The goons simply wanted to show off their power to do as they please.

We saw the goons in action in Seattle a few years ago, when people were demonstrating against the gathering of the world's would be rulers. There was no thought about the safety of the demonstrators, many were simply brutalized by the Seattle goons.

We have read many times where the goon squads have smashed down doors of innocent doctors, because they were curing people with unapproved FDA treatments. Never mind that the treatments worked better then the drugs doctors are forced to use to help people. Often times, in these raids, the goons are as brutal and destructive as they can be as a lesson to anyone else that might resist such actions.

We have read where people have been murdered by these goon squads, only to discover that they were in the wrong house and the murdered people were totally innocent.

We read where an 85 year old woman, in a wheel chair, was tazzered, because she was defending herself with a small kitchen knife, a paring knife if you please, against men twice her size.

NO! If the American people rebelled as the Arabs are rebelling, their rebellion would be met by all the force that the governments at all levels could muster to throw against them. There would be NO concern for how many civilians were murdered or wounded.

We have no way of knowing how many members of the military and the many goon squads would refuse to murder their own people and turn against the goons. This we will have to wait and see, because, sooner or later, it may come to this as the government continues to put the squeeze on the American people. Some day the American people might say, "enough is enough already and rebel against the criminals in charge of government. - Lattigo Smith

Tuesday, March 22, 2011: Will the American people as well as the people in the rest of, what is laughingly called the FREE WORLD, ever wake up and realize who our major enemies are? I seriously doubt they ever will, because their minds are focused on such a narrow view of the world and the great majority of people refuse to believe the truth.

"THE MEN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ADMIRE MOST EXTRAVAGANTLY ARE THE GREATEST LIARS; THE MEN THEY DETEST MOST VIOLENTLY ARE THOSE WHO TRY TO TELL THEM THE TRUTH." H. L. Mencken. Please keep this quote in mind as you read this article, because we know this is one of the mot truthful statements ever made.

In the early forties, The "HOUSE COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES" please notice carefully the proper name of the committee, which the greatest liars changed to read "THE HOUSE UNAMERICAN ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE," making it look like it was un-American to investigate communism's influence in government and other organizations.

In the fifties Senator Joe McCarthy was elected to the senate from Wisconsin. When Senator McCarthy arrived in Washington. he was invited to the home of the Secretary of Defense, Mr. James Forrestal, for dinner.

Mr. Forrestal told Senator McCarthy: that the administration was loaded with communist, who were brought in during the Roosevelt administration and allowed to remain in the Truman administration. Mr. Forrestal, said, he was in no position to do anything about the problem ,but as a senator, McCarthy could. Senator McCarthy was amazed at this sudden turn of events and set out to do what he could to expose the enemy from within. Remember the quote above: Both McCarthy and Forrestal were vilified by the press and the "loony left." Forrestal was kidnapped, for being insane, and put in the navy hospital and committed suicide by jumping out of his barred window (an impossibility) to his death and McCarty was slowly poisoned by people close to him until he finally died in the same navy hospital. These events were covered up by the loony left and the compliant lying major media.

We give you this brief history lesson, in the hope that you will pay close attention to the rest of the article and don't be so gullible by what the major media and the loony left tells you, because they are part of the vast enemy network.

We will not attempt to list the enemy in any order of importance, but will list the major cause of ALL our problems.

The enemy realized a couple hundred years or so ago how important it was to control the flow of information and they set out to dominate information and see that the public only hears what the enemy wanted the public to hear.

In the controversial document, "THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LERNED ELDERS OF ZION," the writer says: that the people did not recognize the value of the press "so it had fallen into their hands." Whether this document is a Jewish document, we have no way of knowing for sure, although the POUPULISTS VIEWPOINT believes, after many years of research, that it is a Jewish document. Many patriotic Jews have stated that it is a Jewish document and that the author was probably a member of the Rothschild family dynasty located in Europe. Such a document, if authored by the Roth'schild family, would certainly be accepted by the enemies of freedom. We know they accepted this document as the real thing, because the Communist followed this directive to the letter in Russia and all other countries conquered by the Communist.

The major media is the enemy of freedom

This humble writer was interview for an article that appeared in the May 16, 2005 issue of THE AMERICAN FREE PRESS NEWSPAPER, published in Washington D.C. In this article, I said: that the major media was Americas worst enemy. This message was well received all over the world where the Free Press is circulated. The major media IS MANKIND'S WORST ENEMY, because they refuse to give the people the true facts and try and hide vital information from the people who have a right to know the truth.

You may be amazed as you read this list of names and find that ALL major media owners are Zionist Jews. A little research will prove this vital point. These 20 families are a part of the worldwide conspiracy to destroy the world as we know it and place us all under an evil Soviet Russian Communist style government. Millions will have to die to make the world safe for Zionist communism. The goal of all 20 families are the same, the total slavery of the entire world and THIS YOU HAD BETTER BELIEVE!

Who are the faceless evil owners of the major media?

Electronic News and Entertainment Media

The largest media conglomerate today, is the Walt Disney Company.

Its chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. Their assets include

Touchtone Television

Buena Television and cable networks with more than 100 million

subscribers altogether.

Disney Picture group is headed by Joe Roth, a Jew, and includes

Touchtone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures, Miramax films

is run by the Weinstein brothers, who are Jewish.

Disneyland, Disney World, Epcot Center, Tokyo Disneyland, and Euro

Disney.

Disney owns Capital Cities /ABC, Inc., which in turn owns ten T.V.

stations outright in major markets. Disney is part owner of several European

T.V. stations.·

ABC owns WSPN, headed by CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew

Lifetime T.V.

Arts& Entertainment network

Cable Companies

ABC Radio Network

26 AM and FM stations in many major cities and have 3,400

affiliates.

Disney owns seven daily newspapers

Disney owns Fairchild publications, Women’s Wear Daily, Chilton

Publications (automotive Manuals,) and the Diversified Publishing Group.

TIME WARNER

Time Warner, Inc. Now owns Turner Broadcasting, CEO Is Gerald M.

Levin, a Jew.

HBO is the country’s largest pay-cable network.

Warner owns the largest record company with 50 labels, the biggest

of which is Warner Records. Warner Records began the music that urged blacks

to murder whites.

Time Warner is heavily involved in major films. (Warner Brothers

Studio, Castle Rock Entertainment, and New Line Cinema) and publishing.

Time Warner’s publishing division boss is Norman Pearlstine, a Jew,

is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated,

People, Fortune).

Adding Turner Broadcasting to the fold made Time-Warner the top

company. This took a Gentile, Ted Turner, out of broadcasting

When Turner wanted to buy CBS, the Jews went into action,

convincing Lawrence Tisch, a Jew to take over CBS: which he did.

Next in size is Viacom, Inc. The boss is Murray Rothstein, a Jew

Viacom produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest

networks, owns 13 Television stations and 12 radio stations. They produce

feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by a Jewish woman, Sherry

Lansing.

The publishing includes Simon & Schuster. The Free Press, and

Pocket Books. They distribute videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores.

They are involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.

They produce programming through Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and

other networks. They are the largest single purveyor of race-mixing

propaganda to White teenagers and sub-teens in America and Europe. MTV pumps

its racially mixed rock and rap videos into 210 million homes in 71

countries and is the dominant cultural influence on White teenagers around

the world.

Nickelodeon is gradually moving towards the same poison sent out by

MTV.

The goal of the Jews is to mongrelize the races: this would

eventually do away with the White race.

Edgar Bronfman, Jr., the Seagram liquor baron is the new boy on the

block. Edgar Bronfman, Sr. is the head of the World Jewish Congress.

Bronfman owns MCA and Universal Pictures (now Universal Studios).

MCA owns Interscope Records, the foremost promoter of “gangsta

rap.”

Bronfman acquired control of PolyGram, this will make them the

fourth largest media empire.

PolyGram owns the Deutsche Grammopon, Decca-London, and Philips

record companies.

Rupert Murdoch’s news Corporation, which owns Fox Television

Network, 20th Century Fox films, and Fox 2000, is the fifth largest

megamedia corporation in the country

Murdoch owns Fox; but Peter Chermin, who is president and CEO of

Fox group, which includes all of News Corporation’s film, television, and

publishing operations in the United States, is a Jew.

Under Chermin, as chairman of Fox 2000, is a Jew, Laura Ziskin.

Jew Peter Roth is president of Fox Entertainment.

News Corporation also owns the New York Post and TV Guide, and they

are published under Chemin’s supervision.

New World Entertainment is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also

owns Revlon cosmetics

DreamWorks is owned by industry mogul David Geffin, Jeffrey

Katzenberg, and Steven Spielberg, all are Jews.

It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and

distribution of films since the beginning of the industry. Marlon Brando

said recently they still control the industry, Ben Stein agrees.

ABC, NBS, & CBS have always been owned by Jews.

ABC by Leonard Goldenson

CBS by William Paley, then by Laurence Tisch

NBC by David Sarnoff, then by his son Robert. All the networks are

staffed by Jews, and this did not change when they were absorbed by other

corporations. The news division remains controlled by Jews.

ABC news by Paul Friedman, a Jew.

NBC by Neal Shaprio, a Jew.

CBS by Al Ortiz, a Jew

CBS morning news by Al Berman, a Jew

CNN by Rick Kaplan, a Jew.

The Print Media

There is less independence, less competition, and much less

representation of majority interest than a casual observer would think.

The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack

of real competition among America’s daily newspapers. It illustrates the

insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on

which they could fasten their grip.

The Newhouses own 26 daily newspapers, including some of the

largest.

Newhouse owns 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV

systems

Newhouse owns, some of the country’s largest cable networks.

Newhouse owns Parade magazine, the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,

Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden,

and the Conde Nast group.

The Newhouse empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an

immigrant from Russia. Newhouse is now owned by his two sons, Samuel and

Donald

Newspapers rely on advertising to survive, and all major companies:

that advertise are owned by Jews. For that reason a newspaper must watch

what they say, or they will soon be out of business.

NEWS MAGAZINES

Time magazine is run by Gerald Levin, a Jew.

Newsweek is published by The Washington Post Company, owned by the

Jewess Katharine Meyer Graham

U.S. News & World Report is owned by Mortimer B. Zuckerman. He also

owns the Atlantic Monthly, and the New York Daily News

The wire services are also owned by the Zionist Jews and this is where the small town newspapers get all their national and international news. If the small town newspapers do not toe the Zionist line, they will not get any national advertising and newspapers depend on advertisement to survive on.

So you can see that The Zionist Jews have followed the advice of the Rothschild produced "THE PROROCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION," and have swallowed up ALL the major media outlets in the country. One can easily see that this makes these Zionist Jews one of the major enemies of freedom in the entire world.

Let us quickly add: that most Jews around the world oppose the Zionist dream of world conquest and want nothing to do with the Zionist Jews goals. That is one of the main reason, few American Jews migrated to the NEW ISRAEL.

Another group of major enemies of freedom

We are going to talk about the SUPER-RICH owners of the major multinational corporations. After 60 years in the trenches, fighting the evil would be world rulers, it takes a lot to shock me. But I bought a package of Three Musketeers mini bars and discovered that they are manufactured in Portugal. No manufacturing plant owned or controlled by these SUPER-RICH men and women has any guarantee, that it will remain on American soil. Any American job that can be moved, has, or will be removed and set up in some third world country. This is being done to deliberately destroy our economy and bring us to our knees. The huge profits are then used to buy and pay for the evil bastards that are running our country. Don't it frost your gizzard to call for help with some computer program and discover that you are talking to some moron on India, that you can barely understand. An American used to have this job

We must wake up and realize that we have been HAD. This country no longer belongs to the people, but to the evil Zionist Communist Jews dead set on ruling the world. While this is supposed to be " A country of the people, by the people and for the benefit of all the people." What we actually have is, "A country of the SUPER-RICH, by the SUPER-RICH and for the sole benefit of the SUPER-RICH." Don't get us wrong: We believe a person should be able to make all the money he can, just as long as he makes it honestly and does not use his money to suppress others. But, you can see, that the SUPER-RICH are using their illegal money to subvert the rest of the world into a classless society, where there will only be lords and serfs and you know who we will be. That is, those of us who are allowed to live in the New World Order.

OUR FOOD SUPPLY IS IN DANGER: Because we have watched the SUPER-RICH gain control of the food supply from the farm to the table. The enemy was able to take over most farms during the great depression. We have watched as they have taken over the retail sales of food by owning and controlling ALL the major food chains. They also own the distribution system that delivers the food to the grocery stores. This puts them in a position cut short the food supply anytime it pleases them to do so. It also allows them to charge whatever they want to charge for the food they sell. They used this system in the old Soviet Union to keep the food supply short and expensive. We, now, see signs that food prices are going up and the weather is being blamed for this price increase. So: It is easy to see, that the SUPER-RICH are another major enemy of ALL mankind, because their goal is to rule the entire world in a NEW WORLD ORDER. Don't get mad at us for telling you the truth.

Perhaps or biggest and worst enemy is the banks. One of the main reasons President John F. Kennedy was assassinated was to keep him from printing our money, by-passing the Federal Reserve Banking System and cheating the banks out of the insane profits made by handling the money supply.

Perhaps you don't know how the Federal Reserve Banking System works. The United states wants a hundred billion dollars, they go to the Fed and give them bonds for the money. The Fed prints the money on our own printing presses, using our own ink and paper. As you can see this cost the Fed nothing. Then the Fed charges the U.S. 6% interest for letting us have the 100 hundred billion dollars. This is one of the biggest swindles in the history of the country. If we printed our own money, as President Kennedy was prepared to do, there would be NO NATIONAL DEBT. So then, is it not easy to see why President Kennedy had to die? He had to die for the benefit of the Federal Reserve Banking System and the men and women that owns this evil system.

Here are the principle owners of the Federal Reserve Banks:

The Rothschild Family – London

The Rothschild Family – Berlin

The Lazard Brothers Paris

Israel Seiff – Italy

Kuhn-Loeb – Germany

The Warburgs – Amsterdam

The Warburgs – Hamburg

Lehman Brothers – New York

Goldman Sachs – New York

The Rockefeller Family – New York

You will kindly note that seven of the ten owners of the Federal Reserve Banks are foreigners. You will also note, that two of the owners are the evil Rothschild family of London and Berlin. This makes our congress and the President guilty of treason for allowing foreigners to control our money supply and our economic policy.

ALL this information is easily verified by searching the Internet. You must realize that YOU have very few real friends in Congress and NO friends among the present administration and NO friends among Government bureaucrats. They sold their soul many years ago and you cannot expect any help from anybody in the government. YOU ARE ON YOUR OWN. We have, as clear as we know how, showed you the face of the enemy. WHAT WILL YOU DO ABOUT IT. - - Bill Gibbons

he Washington Post reported

American Free Press, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Web site http://www.americanfreepress.net

'Anti-bullying' Bill Supported by the ADL Is Designed To Prevent Honest Discussion of Israeli Crimes.

By Rev. Ted Pike

Wednesday, December 22, 2010: Since Israel's brutal siege of Palestine and the recent deadly flotilla attack, its reputation has plummeted worldwide, including on American college campuses. Not content to respond with debate and mere Internet censorship, Israeli's public relations front. the Anti-Defamation League (ACL), has been struggling to do what cowards do best: Make such criticism a hate crime.

The ADL's latest "anti-bullying" legislation, HR 6216, was submitted in October to the U.S. House of Representatives by these Jewish legislators--Sen. Arlen Specter and Reps. Brad Sherman and Eliot Engel--to end increasing criticism of Israel on American campuses. It would actually make such criticism, which creates "emotional distress" in Jewish students, illegal.

By adding religion to the protected classes in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, this bill will criminalize general, repeated criticism of broad issues around Jewish religion, politics and ethnicity. Like nothing else, the state of Israel epitomizes Jewish ethnicity and culture. Although this bill is only one page long and seems innocent, don't be deceived.

HR 6216 violates the 14th Amendment by granting special rights and privileges to yet another group under the Civil Rights Act. This edition is especially ominous for Christians because Attorney General Holder admitted federal hate crimes law does not protect Christians but only Jews and other non-Christians.

ADL INVADES EDUCATION

Especially irked by the free speech growing American universities, Jewish groups have already been pressuring the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) to outlaw "anti-Semitism" on campus. They scored a major victory recently in persuading Secretary of Education Arne Duncan to issue detailed guidelines that in effect apply Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect Jewish students on campus.

Just as the federal "hate" law last year designated homosexuals for special protection from hate crimes under the Civil Rights Act, and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) would have added the same protection to homosexuals and transgenders, the USDE now considers members of the Jewish race in U.S. public education to be protected from "anti-Semitic" criticism. What does that mean? The guidelines say negative generalization about Jewish behavior or ethnic characteristics are true? Consider these true statements about most American Jews.

They are predominantly liberals, favoring abortion, homosexual rights, evolution, banning Christian symbols in public places etc.

They support Israel's policies against Palestinians.

They oppose virtually all aspects of the Christian-conservative political agenda, including incorporation of Christian values in government.

They tend to gravitate towards positions of power and influence, while usually avoiding military service.

They reject Jesus Christ and the need to repent and trust in Him in order to find spiritual fulfillment.

So, according to USDE, it is now illegal for such general statements to be repeated on campus. It appears that any public education institution allowing such "hate" can lose federal funding. They can even face federally sanctioned lawsuits and indictment.

Rep. Sherman said, "The policy is now clear: colleges and universities will no longer be permitted to turn a blind eye when Jewish students face severe and persistent anti-Semitic hostility on their campuses." the guidelines also state that if any publicly supported school allows "hostility" against matters Jewish (perhaps criticism of Israel's siege of Gaza or the flotilla attack) it can be forced to create a reeducation program for the entire school. This is tyranny against free speech.

Will Congress uphold decree?

Of course, Duncan's decree is unconstitutional. However, the USDE's Civil Rights Division has power to enforce the Civil Rights Act, making federal hate criminals out of "anti-Semitic" students and faculty. But for the USDE decree to be most effectively enforced and to repel Constitutional challenges, it needs to be enshrined in federal law by an act of Congress. That is why lovers of freedom must make absolutely sure this legislation is vigorously resisted NOW.

It represents the beginning of organized attempts to outlaw criticism of Talmudic Judaism and Israel, not just in public education but everywhere. If this bill is passed, it will be a small step under the Civil Rights Act to ban criticism of Jewish issues in businesses of 20 or more employees, possibly including churches. Such censorship could progress, as happened in ADL hate-law countries, to outlaw "hateful speech" in all of society! By that time, America would be under a speech-crime regime with no regard for the First Amendment free-speech guarantees.

(If more and more people are protected from "hare speech," white male protestants will be the only people not protected by some federal law. Lattigo Smith.)

Tuesday, December, 21, 2010:

After reading this article, we wonder how anyone can have any faith that Congress will make any real attempt to keep criminals out of the House of Representatives. Remember Con. Jim Traficant was railroaded into prison on less serious crimes then Rangel is found guilty of and Jim was dismissed by Congress, as being unworthy to serve in the House.

RANGEL: THE HOOD FROM HARLEM

By Victor Thorn

Although she has little room to talk, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) vowed to "drain the swamp" that plagues our nation's capital. Although the results have been less than stellar, one of the Trilateral Commission's mighty has taken an embarrassing fall.

On Nov. 16, an eight-member House committee found Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) guilty of violating 11 ethics rules in regard to financial and fundraising misconduct. Two days later this same panel censured him, in effect giving the New York Democrat nothing more than a public scolding.

Charges against him included the improper use of House stationary to solicit campaign money. failure to disclose over half a million dollars in assets on tax forms, illegally utilizing rent-controlled apartments as his campaign headquarters, the failure to report rental income from properties in the Dominican Republic, and using campaign money as a personal slush fund.

Beltway insiders have long been aware of Rangel's underhanded practices. In 2009, Citizens for responsibility and Ethics in Washington named Rangel one of Washington's most corrupt congressmen for the second straight year.

Not surprisingly, this career politician's history of padding his pockets stretches back decades. An understanding of the criminal culture surrounding him can be found in what became known as the Harlem Mafia or Gang of Four. Among its members were Rangel, New York City's first black mayor David Dinkins, Basil Paterson and powerbroker Percy Sutton.

Sutton rose to prominence as an attorney for Malcolm X, and then groomed Rangel as his protégé. Their influence became so pronounced that in 2006 Gov. Eliot Spitzer selected influential Harlem state Sen. David A. Paterson as his running mate after a meeting with Sutton and Rangel.

Paterson is the son of Basil Paterson, attaining his father's former state senate seat in 1985. The elder Paterson also served as New York's secretary of state.

In 2008, Sutton dropped a bombshell by claiming that Barak Obama's tuition at Harvard Law School had been facilitated by Kahlid al-Mansour, a "political godfather" who mentioned Huey Newton and Bobby Seale, two of the Black Panther Party's founding members.

The vote to censure Rangel was 333 to 79.

Sutton's status as a race-baiter emerged following the 1987 Tawana Brawley slander case when he paid Rev. Al Sharpton's fines. Brawley falsely accused six white men, including police officers, of raping her. Another lifelong race-based shakedown artists, Rev. Jesse Jackson , selected Sutton as his presidential campaign finance chairman in 1988.

Rangel and Sutton were subsequently linked via Harlem's Apollo Theater scandal where Sutton faced charges of financial mismanagement. Rangel headed the Apollo Foundation's board of directors.

Rangel also found an ally in New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller. In a March 31 article entitles "Charlie Rangel: Harlem's Godfather," Bud Meyers described how Rockefeller 'arranged for Rangel to run on the Republican and Democratic ballot line during his 1968 reelection."

Other troublesome undertakings have arisen. In January 1978 Rangel attended a conference hosted by a Soviet front organization known as the World Peace Council. The sponsor was Abe Feinglass, a Chicago-based advisory member for the Communist Party USA.

Similar to President Obama's spiritual advisor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who has promoted a host of Marxist and "black liberation" causes, Rangel harbors his own affinity for the radical politics of victimization.

Although crying poormouth to this day, Rangel and his opportunists cohorts in the Gang of Four cabal all ended up fabulously wealthy . In contrasts, the lives his black constituents in Harlem have been wracked for decades by poverty, rampant abuse, gang warfare and high dropout rates.

IRAQ A NEO-CON NIGHTMARE

By Richard Walker

Tuesday, November 16, 2010: The final nails are being driven in the coffin holding the remains of the neo-conservative dream of Iraq as an American puppet state that would have provided a massive oil reservoir for decades to come and also a buffer against Israel's enemies Iran, Syria and Lebanon.

The recently released Wikileaks documents detailing America's involvement in Iraq are sufficient testimony to a cruel hoax played on the American public by the likes of Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and George W. Bush ,not t mention former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. The documents show how the excesses of mercenaries in Iraq led to the killing of civilians. They also confirm how the neo-cons built a second army run by the private sector that is so large that there are more mercenaries today in Afghanistan than U.S. troops.

Wikileaks is a web site that allows whistleblowers to anonymously leak official documents, audio and videos so that information gets out to the world and avoids the filters put in place by the controlled media.

Worse are revelations showing hw Rumsfeld and company ensured no action was taken to prevent the torture of Iraqi people by Iraqi units trained by the U.S. and how more civilians were killed at U.S. checkpoints than those maintained by guerrilla fighters.

The leaked documents expose the lie that the Pentagon never kept any account of civilian deaths. What appears in the documents confirm that, aside from the more than 80,000 deaths listed in Pentagon files, there were at least 15,000 unaccounted for. Some estimates put the new total higher than 120,000.

But even before the Wikileaks released of documents--and with more promised--the death knell for the neo-cons' Iraq had already rung loudly and no more than a year. Much to the dismay of the Obama White House, Iraq dream has gradually lurched politically toward Iran and Lebanon while Chinese and Russians have been afforded big oil contracts at the expense of U.S. companies. More significantly, a bane of the neo-cons, the fiery cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, has become the major powerbroker in Iraq. Through his auspices, especially his Iranian connections, Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has been able to stay in power.

Obama had hoped, as did the Pentagon and the neo-cons still within it, that Washington's ally Iyad Allawi, a former CIA asset, would garner enough support to form a parliamentary coalition with al-Maliki, embracing a large enough delegation of Shiites and Sunnis. Al-Sadr quickly made it clear to al-Maliki that it would be a disastrous move because Sardists in the parliament would bring him down.

If al-Maliki did not see sense in that, others succeeded in convincing him. In September, he attended a private meeting in Iran hosted by al-Sadr, Gen. Qassem Sulemani of the al-Quds division of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, a representative of Syria's President Assad and a senior representative from Hezbollah, who carried a message from Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, that a coalition between al-Maliki and al-Sadr would be better for Iraq and the region.

Al-Maliki agreed, and the loser in the deal were the Obama White House and Israel. Al-Maliki's decision showed that he no longer feared Washington and its allies in the region, especially Jordan, Israel and Saudi Arabia. As for al-Sadr, his traditional opposition to Washington is sure to harden as he becomes more politically powerful in the years to come.

The most striking aspect of this new coalition is how it highlights the fraudulent claims by Israel and its Washington allies in 2001 that toppling Saddam Hussein would eliminate the possibility of a Shiite alliance between Iraq's majority and its co-religionists in Iran and Lebanon. Now we know the opposite has occurred, and Iran and its allies in the region are re-energized.

Remember, there was high-blown rhetoric by the neo-cons, assuring the American public that Iraq's oil revenues would pay for the war and then some. That lie is further compounded by a new reality: China and Russia, who were never part of the war, are being treated like liberators and are being offered the best oil research and development contracts. Turkey and India have also courted Iraq and Iran, both ready to ignore U.S.-Israel policy on Iran in favor of economic gain.

One of the emerging features of today's Iraq policy is Obama's willingness to allow the Pentagon to slow down the planned exit of U.S troops from Iraq, which is due to be completed by the end of 2011. that has been done in response to Israeli pressure and the view of some military hawks that a strike against Iran would require a sizable U.S. force in Iraq.

That has not gone unnoticed in Iraq and among its allies in Iran, Syria and Lebanon. It may well be that the U.S. plan to leave 30,000 or more troops in Iraq after December 2011 will be vetoed by the new political alliance of al-Sadr and al-Maliki. The best thing for the United States would be to be booted out of Iraq.

U.S. GOVERNMENT FUNDS GLOBAL ISRAELI ARMS INDUSTRY

By Richard Walker

Monday, November 15, 2010: Over the years Washington has bankrolled Israel's arms industry, helping to make it a major global player. At the same time, Washington's under-the-table gifts of weapons have increased the size of Israel's arsenal, even as Israel aids China and various pariah states militarily.

Washington's recognition that arms are at the core of Israel's political machine was evident when the Obama White House recently included a secret arms deal as one of its incentives to encourage Israel to end its theft of Arab lands. The deal was signed to get Israel to sit down with the Palestinians. In all its dealings with Washington, Israel has consistently demanded money, guns and missiles in return for its role in talks about the creation of an independent Palestinian state.

On a more profound level, the Israeli arms industry has been so interlinked with the Israel government that it has helped shape the country's foreign policy over decades.

A recent example of that was the 2009 "diplomatic" trip to five African nations by Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. One of the trip's remarkable features, which hinted at its real purpose, was the presence of a sizeable contingent of arms industry representatives on Lieberman's plane. One of the countries visited was Nigeria, which has used its considerable oil revenues to buy close to $66 million in arms form Israel. Most of Nigeria's oil profits are controlled by a corrupt elite. Little is spent on improving the lives of the poor.

After Lieberman returned to Israel, claiming he had gone to Africa to assist nations dealing with hunger and water purification, Israeli author and journalists Yossi Melman wrote a scathing article about the trip, saying its real aims were to promote Israel's arms industry and secretly establish links with the Israeli intelligence agency, the Mossad. He claimed that Mossad operated in some African nations, presumably the ones buying weapons, thanks to the CIA cash channeled to Israel's "labor federation." In effect, the CIA was paying Mossad agents to operate in Africa, posing as humanitarians.

Israel's role in Africa has often been ignored but it has been significant because it has supplied weapons to states like Sudan and Ethiopia. In Melman's eyes "it is a sad truth" that Israel's dealings in Africa have always been linked to arms sales even when the countries buying weapons were engaged in bloody, sadistic civil wars. Some examples include Uganda, Congo and Liberia. The sale of weapons to African nations has not only been vital to the Israel economy, it has also been part of a strategy to improve Israel's intelligence on its Arab neighbors by getting a foothold in countries that border them.

Ironically, one of the more troubling aspects of America's Israeli policy is how Washington has turned a blind eye to Israel as it uses part of the tens of billions of dollars in U.S. aid over several decades to expand the Israeli arms industry. The result has been profit losses to American arms companies, which have to compete with their Israel counterparts across the globe.

The arms industry overall has always been controlled by ex-politicians, ex-military and retired intelligence figures, who maintain a high level of cover for their business dealings. Some surveys have identified Israel as No. 3 in the world of weapons makers. Its customers are spread across the globe and include Eastern Europe, from which it was banned during the Cold War.

Since the 1980s, Israel has been selling weapons to China. The dangers of that trade can be seen in the way Israel acquired Sidewinder air-to-air missiles from the United States and then secretly used the technology to create a similar missile called the Python III. The Chinese bought Pythons and fitted them to jet fighters built around Israeli jet designs. In 2001, Chinese jet fighters armed with Pythons were on the verge of bringing down U.S. surveillance planes.

Te bill in question was the Creating American jobs and End Offshoring Act (S. 3816, sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-ILL.).

According to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), one of the bill's cosponsors, the measure would put an end to the assistance Washington has been giving Big Business to move American jobs overseas.

Among other things, it gives companies a two-year payroll tax break when they hire new employees to perform services in the United States that had previously been done abroad.

It also eliminates the tax break--a corporation subsidy--that companies get for closing down factories and moving them abroad. Says Sanders: "The bill prohibits a firm from taking any deductions, loss or credit for amounts paid in connection with reducing or ending the operation of a trade or business in the U.S. an starting or expanding a similar trade or business overseas."

Finally, the bill closes down federal tax subsidy that has been rewarding U.S. companies that move their factories to foreign lands. "Under current law," says Sanders, "U.S. companies can defer paying U.S. tax on income earned by their foreign subsidiaries until that income is brought back to the United States." This is known as "deferral" and puts American companies at a distinct disadvantage because they are responsible for taxes no matter whether they sell their wares or not.

At a time when unemployment is at a record high, the bill should have been a no-brainer for legislators when it came up for a vote. But only eight senators sponsored it --all Democrats except for Sanders, a Vermont independent. But even worse, neither Democrats or Republicans could get the 60 votes necessary to pass a cloture bill to get it to the floor for a vote. That's because the Chamber of Commerce, which donates heavily to Republicans and Democrats, came down hard against it.

This should not come as a surprise, considering it has been revealed that the Chamber of Commerce has been receiving significant funding from companies in foreign countries. According to the left-wing populists organization, ThinkProgress, the chamber has been accepting millions of dollars tax-free from companies in China, India, Bahrain, Egypt and Russia, among other countries, and then funneling that money into U.S. political campaigns in violation of federal election law. In return, the chamber has become a vocal proponent of globalism, which includes sending U.S. jobs abroad and hiring cheap labor.

In a letter to Congress, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Bruce Josten displayed his complete incompetence, his disdain for American workers and his utter lack of patriotism by claiming that bringing much needed jobs back to the United States would not really help the U.S. economy.

"Replacing a job that is based in another country with a domestic job does not stimulate economic growth or enhance the competitiveness of American worldwide companies," Josten scribbled.

So what does Josten suggest Congress do to help Main Street America and boost the economy? He says Congress should make permanent the tax breaks for the two-percent of the American population that earns more than $250,000 a year.

The insanity of Josten's claims is revealed in the fact that consumer spending accounts for 70 percent of the U.S. economy. In Plain English, that means, if there are no jobs for working-class Americans, there is no more United States. SOMEBODY ET A ROPE - MORE

(Editor's note: This is more evidence, that we have two branches of the same party and NO ONE in either party can be fully trusted to do what is best for Americans - Lattigo Smith. See more evidence in the article below.)

WALL STREET OWNS HOUSE AND SENATE

If anyone ever had any doubt who owns Congress, It's evident by a new report detailing how Wall Street has been handing out lots of cash to those who introduce and vote on measures that eventually become the law of the land.

A study by the independent magazine Mother Jones found that, while AT&T may be the top giver, financial firms make up half of the top 10 corporate donors to Congress.

Wall Street's most generous givers are all household names. They include Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, the American Bankers Association and the National Realtors Association.

How much money are we talking about here? In the past 20 years, financial, insurance and real estate firms gave almost $2.5.billion to congressional candidates. A hodge-podge of manufacturing companies, grocery-store chains and breweries came in a distant second with less than $1.5 billion.

(Remember 375 in congress were re-elected, while only six senators were replaced. So one can easily see, that the "old guard" still rules the roost in Congress - Lattigo Smith.)